When A Spy Goes Rogue, Pt 6
Discover more from Spy Stack - Project Ragnarock
WARNING: There are graphic and disturbing images posted in the last section of this article. If you are sensitive to this sort of thing don’t read the last section.
INTRODUCTION
As I’ve mentioned in previous articles, people don’t see corporate psychopaths and sociopaths in the same light as serial killers. There’s a perception that they’re somehow different even though there’s never any rational explanation as to why.
The reality is that the serial killers themselves often admit their social environment was normal. In fact, only 40% state they were subjected to childhood abuse. In at least some cases those claims are questionable, in other cases the diagnosis may have been confused with ASPD (Anti-Social Personality Disorder) which is similar but not the same.
That said, not all psychopaths are serial killers as far as we know and we don’t really know what makes one psychopath a serial killer and another one not. Nor do we know for sure that the corporate psychopath or sociopath isn’t a serial killer and just hasn’t been caught.
One corporate psychopath did get caught, so we know they exist. Robert Dunst, American real estate mogul, was convicted of two murders and suspected of more. Canada’s top secret Dubai base and Trenton Air Force base (largest in Canada) were commanded by serial killer/rapist, Russell Williams. There is good reason to believe he also committed more than two rape/murders.
Two of Canada’s worst serial killers, Clifford Olson and Robert Pickton, had close ties to the RCMP and were informants. They escaped detection for years because, in my opinion, this relationship protected them.
It’s also true that while all psychopaths have ASPD traits, not everyone with ASPD traits is a psychopath. This is where a lot of the confusion resides.
“Another issue that has affected research in this area is the failure to make an accurate distinction between ASPD [Anti-Social Personality Disorder] and psychopathy”
“In an evaluation study (Harris, Rice, & Cormier, 1994), including 292 male violent offenders (treated for at least 2 years with the average time spent in the program being 5 years), 146 were treated in the therapeutic community and the other 146 were sent to prison. The program's violent recidivism rate was 40%, with little difference between the groups. However, when the outcome of psychopaths was evaluated separately, an unexpected discovery was made; the violent recidivism rate of psychopaths in the treatment group was almost one third higher than those who had been sent to prison. It was speculated that the treatment program raised psychopaths' self-esteem and consequently increased aggression. It also was speculated that instead of learning to be more empathic and concerned about others, like the nonpsychopaths, the psychopaths only learned how to appear more empathic in order to better manipulate and deceive others (Harris et al., 1994; Rice, 1997).”
“The terms APSD and psychopathy are often used synonymously and incorrectly….Psychopaths embody most, if not all, of these characteristics, but they are more accurately described as "remorseless predators who use charm, intimidation and, if necessary, impulsive and cold-blooded violence to attain their ends" (Hare, 1996)
“However, when speaking to people who knew them as children, serial killers are usually described as a little "off." As children, fledgling serial killers often set fires, torture animals, and wet their beds. These red flag behaviors are known as the "triad" of symptoms.”
Psychopathic serial killers don’t have or need a reason to kill, they just want to kill. They’re driven by that desire and they always target the vulnerable.
The sociopathic serial killer is different. They need a reason to kill but don’t have any boundaries to prevent themselves from killing. They kill to solve a problem, clear a roadblock, or eliminate a potential threat (perceived or real). Like the psychopath they’re cowards, so if their target isn’t someone who is vulnerable, they devise other ways to have the murder executed indirectly.
“Sociopathy is an antisocial personality disorder that is characterized by the following traits such as:
A disregard for rules and social mores
A disregard for the rights of others
A failure to feel remorse or guilt
Can display violent behavior”
“Because sociopathy appears to be learned rather than innate, sociopaths are capable of empathy or forming an emotional connection with others but only to certain individuals such as a family member or friend and only in certain circumstances.”
The Sociopath-Serial Killer connection, Psychology Today, 2014
In my opinion, John Kennett Starnes, ex-Director of the RCMP Security Service and Cyril Reitman meet the definition of psychopaths with Starnes being a Puppet Master. I believe Joel Reitman meets the definition of a sociopath.
CONVENIENTLY-TIMED DEATHS AND SCANDALS
The Starnes/Multigenerational Reitman cult, Canada’s Epsteins, have years of experience in covering their tracks and avoiding prosecution for their crimes. Their methods are now well-established.
The seeds of their methodology were established during the Greta Goede frame-up. They controlled the narrative with compromised cops, direct access to the media through their cousin, Jeremy Reitman (deceased), who had media connections while preventing Greta’s access to the media, political influence-peddling via Starnes, compromised Greta’s lawyer and inserted a corrupt psychiatrist, Ewan Cameron, into the mix. It was all staged, in my opinion.
During Greta’s era, the Reitman/Starnes home base was Montreal. Greta was released by Toronto Police who arrested and interrogated her initially. She had been living in Toronto and stated she’d been in Brampton visiting friends when the “kidnapping” occurred. They cleared her indicating there was no evidence against her. She was sent to Montreal at the demand of the Montreal Police who claimed they had evidence. They didn’t have a shred of forensic evidence to prove her presence in Montreal. Just shady witness testimony from the Reitmans as well as a cab driver and his wife. Both the cab driver and his wife were well rewarded after the trial out of “gratitude”.
After the AdScam scandal, they changed their home base to Toronto and advanced their methodology by advancing their influence. Now they were getting compromised Police Chiefs, Mayors, RCMP Commissioners, OPP Commissioners into place. Oversight bodies and Professional Associations were compromised by inserting members who had been corrupted. Then they expanded to Business and Community groups. They had family members on the BoD of Bank of Montreal who connected with other banks. They had always exploited charitable organizations after fund-raising for them. When they founded Canada’s Israeli Lobby, they proceeded to exploit it to further spread their influence even wider. They have a lot of connections in pedophile circles and recruit from them routinely from the lowest level street harasser to the politicians they influence-peddle into high positions.
As a result, they were able to commit numerous crimes and undermine Canada’s democracy (such as it is) with impunity and continue to do so.
I believe these people are psychopaths and sociopaths because normal people, including normal Intel and LE agents don’t behave in such bizarre, extreme, and often irrational ways. It’s unheard of.
Yes, terrible things were done to people during the COINTELPRO and RCMP Wrongdoings eras. Leading activists were framed and some in the US are still serving jail sentences.
Even today, the Spy Cops investigations in the UK are exposing lots of wrong-doings by police against activists, particularly women activists.
What was and continues to be done to me is way beyond extreme and is unheard of, especially given the fact that I wasn’t an activist when it began never mind a leading activist. I was a high school student hanging out with activists.
In fact, neither Starnes nor the Reitmans ever took on the leaders or influencers of the groups they allegedly “hated”.
They never targeted my uncle, his family, or any of the leadership of CPC (M-L).
They claimed repeatedly that Greta Goede was a Nazi and her husband was an SS Officer, implying that she was not deserving of sympathy. I seriously doubt any Nazi would work for a Jewish family.
Greta stated that she wasn’t a Nazi, had lived in Poland and her husband was a Polish construction worker. After he died, she came to Canada.
Starnes, Reitman, and Ewan Cameron were the ones that targeted her. Meanwhile Cameron was hobnobbing with real Nazis in Europe and recruiting them as part of Operation Paperclip. Neither Starnes nor Reitman had an issue with them apparently.
They are now grooming the third generation of Reitmans to target me and others with the recent involvement of Sam Reitman, Cyril’s grandson and Joel’s son. He appears to be in charge of community harassment in Brampton and is organizing the food tampering by certain grocery and take out delivery people as well as the harassment by the racist superintendent of my building who is part of the Stuckless pedophile circle. He’s well into his training as a budding sociopath.
What they are doing to our country is also way beyond extreme.
It’s not the behavior of normal people. It’s the behavior of psychopaths and sociopaths who are hard-core fascist extremists with a greedy and insatiable thirst for power and control.
MURDER? List of conveniently timed deaths that benefited this cult (incomplete).
Details will be provided in my next books of the From the Shadows series: Psychopath Games and Gaslighting Games.
Drew Conlin - sudden massive heart attack
David Noble - sepsis/bronchitis
Jack Layton - cancer
Glen Davis - gunshot by family member (inheritance)
Rick Hundal - sudden massive heart attack (inheritance)
Barry and Honey Sherman - strangulation
Rob Ford - cancer
Arthur Porter - cancer
MAYHEM?
List of conveniently timed scandals that benefited this cult (incomplete).
Details will be provided in my next books of the From the Shadows series: Psychopath Games and Gaslighting Games.
Maxime Bernier - girl friend scandal
Patrick Brown - sex scandal
Ex-Police Chief Noel Catley, Peel Region - coup
Ex-Mayor Susan Fennel, Brampton - illness and financial scandal
Guiliano Zaccardelli - RCMP pensions
Gwen Boniface - indigenous occupation
Rob Ford family - inheritance
Kitty Hundal - inheritance
DEATH THREATS (Direct and Indirect)
1970s: Starnes: “You’re going to get it for this, little lady”
1980s: Anonymous phone call: “You’re dead meat”
1990s: ?
2008-09: Abusive and threatening emails and posts to a debating group I was on
2013-14: 50K bounty placed on me to “erase me permanently from the Internet”
Dec. 2014: Starnes croaks and the death threats end
Series of abusive images sent to me by email in 2008 and 2009:
This is a graphic description of what Jules Grajower told me he was going to do to me when I was imprisoned by him. He also told me he was going to cut off my breasts and then kill me.
My daughter was nearly run over when she was 5, by a car driven by an old guy wearing a fedora and trenchcoat (Starnes stalker group uniform). I pulled her out of the way just barely in time.
This was called “suicide bomber” and I’m presuming it’s referring to my son.
I had a black cat
The 2009 death threat translates to “Fucking whore I’m going to kill you”
Coming next, When A Spy Goes Rogue, Pt 7: Censorship, Greta Goede, CSIS and Shameless Hypocrisy
When A Spy Goes Rogue, Pt 6
There are at least two reasons why non-psychopaths might attempt to construct a social and political structure which either facilitates or guarantees that psychopaths rise to the top (or the apparent apex of power if not the actual one.) Both are delusional, but if there's one talent that psychopaths and sociopaths share, it's the ability to delude!
The first is based on the academic theory that psychopaths are ideally suited to lead the nation (or the world) either in some desperate circumstances, such as the aftermath of nuclear war because they do whatever is necessary, or more generally because psychopaths tend to deliver an agenda. The problem here is that a psychopath's perception of necessity in a given situation may be very flawed indeed and they are not prone to accept outside guidance unless it comes from a VERY skilled manipulator of psychopaths and, in the absence of a very skilled manipulator with a firm grasp on his strings, even the peacetime agenda of a psychopathic leader will be his own and in politics as in business, the psychopath's agenda always brings the roof down in the end. We see this in the second half of Mr Putin's leadership of Russia: his original manipulator lost control of him
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vladislav_Surkov
and was replaced by:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aleksandr_Dugin
who wanted Putin to impose a merger of the Orthodox Church with neo-paganism (no sane and competent person could even make that one up) and since most of the early and sacred history of the "Russian" Church lay in Kyiv and not Moscow, Ukraine had to be conquered by force rather than careful economic entanglement. This is where the roof falls on not just the psychopath, but potentially the whole of Russia.
The other is that some individuals and even some cultures, are highly prone to being charmed by psychopaths and that alone explains how Jacob Zuma came to be ANC president of South Africa. It does not explain, by itself, how Zuma's successor, Cyril Ramaphosa came to be trapped in Zuma's agenda of systemic corruption despite having very accurately described exactly what it was before coming to power himself! Someone who has hosted dinner parties attended by both Jacob Zuma and his predecessor, Tharbo Mbecki, told Medawar that Mbecki is by far the more intelligent and thoughtful leader, but he lacked Zuma's obvious charm and so couldn't retain power. Not that he was able to do very much with power when he had it, other than feather his own nest. I suspect that he was manipulated into a situation where that was the only course open to him: all roads to South Africa's future well-being being blocked.
The Blair government in the UK was always a two-man band, with Blair being the sociopath who needed a tame (and diagnosed) psychopath (Alistair Campbell) in order to function. It was Phillip Gould who devised the scheme that put the two of them in power and when they were in power, the cabinet might as well have been cardboard cutouts, because they had no input into the agenda whatsoever, which is why Robin Cook started briefing the journalist Andrew Gilligan against Blair and Campbell, which caused Blair and Campbell to start the witch-hunt which destroyed Dr David Kelly, who never even saw the documents leaked to Gilligan! Following Gould's death it has not been very clear who in British politics has hold of the strings of either Blair or Campbell: the logical course is to suspect it's actually someone totally outside the UK, perhaps working them through a foreign influence organisation such as the 48 Group Club, of which they are both members. They may be members of other groups, too, but the 48 Group Club connection is well documented.
Interestingly, Marxism seems to be a blueprint for ensuring that sociopaths rise to the top and this may be because they are best able to form an effective team with the kind of psychopath needed to enact the brutal changes in society which Marx desired in order to further his delusional belief that something better always rises from the ashes of destroyed civilisations. (There is no reason why anything BETTER should rise from the ashes and we now live in an age where the means of potential incineration are so complete that there's a good chance that nothing will ever rise from the ashes of our civilisation at all.)
Stalin was succeeded by his pet psychopath, Beria, who was such a complete disaster that the politburo and the army had no choice but to take him down. Even when Stalin was alive but losing his grip, Beria was a menace.
It's the TEAMS between sociopaths and psychopaths that we need to watch. And we need to resist revolutions because they tend to deliver power to such teams, Marxist revolutions being especially dangerous because that's precisely what Marx intended. This was the conclusion which George Orwell reached during WWII, aided by his own frontline experience in the Spanish Civil War. His alternative, put forward in his essays during WWII's darkest days, was to achieve social justice by a form of patriotism which created a culture where the rich and powerful felt under an OBLIGATION to work for the general good. (Not very different at all from Quakerism or the Church of England at its best, but still.) And although hated and despised by the left and right to this day, this idea did take hold and was pursued by every post-war British Prime Minister until Edward Heath, then by Jim Callaghan as well as he could after the damage that Heath had deliberately done to the economy and social cohesion. Thatcher's more strident patriotism lacked any real sense of obligation to the weak or less well off and at least three quarters of her ministers simply lacked patriotism and felt obligation only to their personal contacts. Then came the banker, Major, loyal mainly to other bankers, who paved the way for Gould to put Blair and Campbell into power.
Heath is the anomaly here: whatever he thought he was doing, he was probably doing it by conviction and not some inner compulsion, but in his flirtation with power he did more long-lasting harm than most of the others. If sociopaths and psychopaths form effective but always destructive teams, then what sort of mind is it which manipulates those teams? Is it someone like Heath, who sees a chance to take power and do whatever is in his head, or is it someone like Gould or Surkov, who always stays on the sidelines and whose mind is never really known by anyone?