Censorship
I expect to be removed from Twitter soon. The email check is usually the first step to other Twitter censorship and I just had one.
I’m not surprised by this. The Starnes/Multi-Generational Reitman cult: Canada’s Epsteins, knows they’re guilty of the allegations I’m making, but they need to maintain their narrative of lies. They can’t do that as long as my Free Speech rights are protected.
When you’ve compromised the Judicial and Political system as well as MSM, it’s easy to censor and smear innocent people as well as cover up your own crimes, and, in my opinion, they’ve done a very thorough job of that in Ontario where I live.
However, if they were to falsely charge me with defamation, they’ve involved so many people that they would be risking exposure of their own crimes and lies. They risk people coming forward, comparing contradictory and often bizarre narratives they’ve pushed, asking questions, and/or admitting they were bribed, conned, manipulated, coerced into doing ugly things to me, based on the lies they were told.
They would also find out that people in their recruits circle (like delivery people) are being told different stories to act as a cover to hide their real recruits criminal acts.
So, like the cowards they are, they skulk around in the background, manipulating people with their lies and scams in order to accomplish their sleazy censorship, smear, frame-up, harassment and hate campaign goals without being held to account.
If I tried to take them to court it would never get there. They’ve had twenty plus years to get corrupted judges in place that “owe them” or they have leverage over. I have very solid reasons to believe that this has actually happened.
They’ve also made sure I can’t afford to do it financially.
That said, I’ve never cared that much about suing them anyway. They know this.
I simply want them to get the hell out of my life and if they weren’t, in my opinion, mentally deranged, they would have seen, years ago, that getting the hell out of my life would be to their benefit as well as mine. I wouldn’t have anything to write about or expose. Nor would I have any reason to do so.
Instead, like typical psychopaths and sociopaths they continue to escalate things. I think they actually live for this. They’re bored wealthy dilettantes that have nothing productive to do so they spend their worthless lives fabricating ways to accumulate power and abuse people.
Their ongoing and insane quest for power and control feeds their insatiable thirst.
Greta Goede, 1958
I doubt Greta Goede was Starnes first target but she would have been the first victim of his joint campaign with the Reitmans and Ewan Cameron.
Her facts:
She isn’t a Nazi
She is German but was living in Poland
Her husband was a Polish construction worker
After he died in 1950, she came to Canada in 1954 and worked in various jobs in the west
She became ill in Dawson Creek with a viral infection that affected her hip. This required her to move to Vancouver to enter a rehabilitation clinic for physical therapy
After she recovered, she took a job as a nanny in Vancouver
During this entire period, 1954 to 1958 there were no problems
She moved to Toronto to take a nanny job with the Belzberg family who coincidentally happened to be the Reitman’s cousins
All of a sudden, she’s being accused of extortion with mysterious letters appearing out of nowhere in the Belzberg home threatening the children if money wasn’t provided. There was no evidence she was the source of the threats. No-one picked up the money. She explicitly denied any involvement
She left and took another nanny position with the Cobham family where the same thing occurred. Again, there was no evidence that she was the source of the threats, no-one picked up the money and she explicitly denied any involvement
She was visiting friends in Brampton from May 25 to June 16, at the time of the kidnapping
She never applied for a job in Montreal
She told the Toronto Police she believed someone was impersonating her
The Reitman/Montreal MSM Narrative
Saturday, June 14, 1958 to Monday, June 16, 1958 two-year-old Joel Reitman was “kidnapped”
According to the Reitman’s, Greta had worked for them for two weeks
After her first interrogation by the Toronto Police, she was cleared and released
Toronto Police then arrested her again and sent her to Montreal, now claiming she was definitely the kidnapper based on claims by the Montreal Police
Evidence: her handwritten resume had been sent to a staffing agency in Montreal
Evidence: a handwritten extortion note was found in the Reitman home
Witness statements: Cyril and Dorothy Reitman and Ottawa cab driver, Edward Royer and his wife
The Holes In The Narrative You Can Drive A Truck Through
The first family Greta worked for in Toronto were relatives of the Reitmans
The Lead Investigator for the kidnapping case in Montreal, Detective Greenberg, was a personal friend of the Reitmans. His partner, Detective Bedard shares the same last name as the person I knew in Toronto years later. It’s a common name and could be a coincidence but then again it might not be.
The person interacting with MSM on behalf of the Reitman’s was Jeremy Reitman. Cyril’s cousin. MSM was filled with stories giving his narrative but didn’t appear to be interested in interviewing Greta and getting her side of the story. Some of her side appears in media outside of Canada but very little.
According to Montreal MSM Greta was a Nazi and her husband was a member of the SS. According to Greta, she was German, not a Nazi, living in Poland and her husband was a Polish construction worker
According to Montreal MSM Greta was in a psychiatric facility in Vancouver receiving therapy before she came to Toronto. According to a book written about the kidnapping she was in a rehabilitation facility in Vancouver receiving physical therapy to help her recover from a viral infection in her hip
Oddly, Toronto Police don’t say whether they checked her Brampton alibi and what the outcome was. Presumably, since they cleared her initially, they checked it. That’s basic police investigation 101. So, what changed?
The handwriting comparison of the resume and the note were “inconclusive”
Anyone who had a copy of her handwritten resume could have sent it to the agency as well as use it to forge her handwriting in the extortion note as well as the previous extortion notes in Toronto.
The Reitman’s relatives in Toronto, who Greta had previously worked for, for a short period of time, would have had a copy of her resume
Montreal Police admit that not one shred of physical forensic evidence (fingerprints or hair) was found that would have proved her presence in either the Reitman home or the Montreal Boarding House, both of which she was claimed to have lived in
Not one shred of evidence was found that proved she travelled to Montreal
The “kidnapper” took the child, 2-year-old Joel, to stay in the Lord Elgin Hotel. Rather public for someone who had kidnapped a child and was in “hiding” and very expensive for a “nanny” who never picked up the extortion money
The “nanny” drove around Ottawa in a cab. Also, rather public for a “kidnapper” in “hiding” and expensive for a “nanny”
Coincidentally, Dorothy Reitman was unavailable for media interviews during the entire period of the “kidnapping” allegedly receiving counseling from Ewan Cameron of MKUltra fame, and whose experiments were being partially funded by the Montreal elite as well as the Canadian government and the CIA. She reappeared and did a media appeal the day Joel was “found”
Why would the “nanny” spend money to travel all the way to Ottawa when there were a lot of places closer where she could have hidden herself and Joel? She seems to have been awfully well-off financially for a nanny and completely unconcerned about being seen in public after having kidnapped a child. Coincidentally, the Reitman’s also have relatives in Ottawa. Go figure.
The day Dorothy Reitman reappeared, the “kidnapper” conveniently asked the cab driver if his wife would look after Joel while she went shopping and then didn’t return to pick him up
The cab driver dutifully reported the “abandoned” child to the Ottawa Police who conveniently happened to be listening to the radio when the appeal was made. Joel was picked up and taken to the Reitman relatives’ home in Ottawa where everyone partied including grandfather Sam Reitman and son of Sam, Cyril Reitman as well as Dorothy
The cab driver and his wife were well rewarded after their testimony out of “gratitude”
Wrapping up the story
Greta was a woman who lived frugally and rented a room in a Boarding House but could apparently afford to bus it to Ottawa, stay in a nice hotel, cab around the city for 2 days and then bus it back to Toronto where she was still renting her room in the Boarding House there
Why would she continue renting a room in a Boarding House in Toronto while living in Montreal?
She was convinced, for some reason, that kidnapping charges carried the death penalty (not true in Canada at the time) which would explain why she pled guilty to something she didn’t do
After witness testimony was heard in the Preliminary Hearing Greta pled guilty and was sentenced to seven years after which she was to be deported in 1962
1958 was the year non-consensual experimentation on prisoners was legalized
1958 to 1962 are years John Kennett Starnes activities are unaccounted for. Where was he? What was he up to? He left Paris in 1958: 1956-58 he was Deputy Executive Secretary to the North Atlantic Council in Paris
In 1962, when Greta was to be released and deported, he reappeared as Acting Assistant Under-Secretary of State for External Affairs
Later in 1962-66 he became Ambassador to the Federal Republic of Germany and Head of the Canadian Military Mission in Berlin, returning to Canada in 1967 in the position of Assistant Under-Secretary of State for External Affairs
I don’t know what happened to Greta after her deportation but it looks like Starnes took it upon himself to stalk her and influence events abroad
1970-73 he was appointed by Pierre Elliot Trudeau (Justin’s father) to be the first civilian Director of the RCMP Security Service, at which point I became his next target and RCMP Dirty Tricks became the RCMP SS standard
Off Topic Fun Fact: Ironically, I have more evidence that the Reitman’s are persecuting me than they had to support their allegation that Greta kidnapped Joel.
CSIS (Canada’s CIA)
I’ve been investigated and cleared by CSIS on at least 4 occasions that I know of up to today. The fourth time was publicly confirmed at my place of employment. Each and every time, the investigation was instigated by lies and frame-ups fabricated by Canada’s Epsteins: the Starnes/Multi-Generational Reitman cult. These lies and frame-ups led to the filing of false reports which led to these baseless “investigations”. Filing false reports is, itself, an illegal act.
They (the cult, not CSIS) have gone so far as to illegally change government records to make me look guilty and give their lies merit. They do this by influence-peddling certain people into key positions who have access to the records they want to change, compromise, or embed false information into. I believe they’ve done this in the US as well, through a contact in Homeland Security.
CSIS only targeted me once and I don’t doubt they did so based on two things:
A Starnes instigated fabrication resulting in false reports being filed
The Director of CSIS at the time, October, 2013 to May, 2017 was a Starne’s flunky, Michel Coulombe, who has a long history with CSIS. His temporary replacement was Jeff Yaworski. Yaworski was Deputy Director of Operations before his temporary appointment as Acting Director, when Couloumbe ran off and retired after approving the illegal “disrupt and destroy” campaign targeting me in Brampton and online. Jeff, as Deputy Director of Operations, would have coordinated the campaign. Jeff is the son of Ron Yaworski who was a member of the RCMP Security Service and called to testify at the McDonald Commission on RCMP Wrongdoings at the time that Starnes was Director. Ron was also the one who made the decision to have the Operation Checkmate files destroyed. All very incestuous. Jeff Yaworski also retired quickly after the new Director, Vigneault was appointed in 2017. Both Couloumbe and Yaworski joined CSIS shortly after it was founded and at a time when it was still filled with old school RCMP SS members. It’s not uncommon in Canada for government or public officials to retire after they’ve knowingly done something illegal so they can avoid accountability. Starnes did the same thing in 1973.
The illegal “disrupt and destroy” campaign which targeted me, ran from September, 2014 to December, 2016.
In 2015, after Harper and the Cons, with the support of Trudeau and the Libs, passed Bill C51, the Anti-Terrorism Bill, CSIS’ mandate was expanded. Domestic “disrupt and destroy” campaigns targeting Canadians became legal. CSIS can harass anyone for any reason. You don’t have to be a terrorist and they don’t need any proof that you’ve done anything wrong.
If they want to violate your civil rights, like they did with me, they need a judicial warrant but good luck proving anything or fighting that in court. The only way you’ll get anywhere with that is if a whistleblower comes forward.
The Damage Canada’s Spies Can Do by Andrew Mitrovica
Starnes croaked shortly after the campaign started (Dec. 2014) and Cyril Reitman had croaked in June, 2014, before it began.
Joel Reitman had taken over the hate campaign against me on behalf of his father after Cyril Reitman, son of Sam, developed Alzheimers. He continued after Starnes croaked.
The “disrupt and destroy” campaign accomplished two things that directly benefitted the now Multi-Generational Reitman cult:
It gave the cult hate campaign against me credibility. If CSIS was targeting me there must have been a good reason, right?
Wrong: The Terrible Myth - William Kunstler
It was another attempt to publicly sexually degrade me by sexual predators, since, aside from the smears and other abuses, they produced a deep fake porn video which they posted on Porn Hub. This isn’t the first time that’s happened and I don’t doubt it was done on Starnes behalf.
Starnes was a pervert and a pig. At least I have the pleasure of knowing he never got to see it.
Off Topic Fun Fact: During the same period Anonymous had a shady Anon running around whose last name was also Couloumbe, calling himself Anonymous York (not the same as the Anonymous York from 2008 – that was a legit account from the Anti-Scientology protest days). The shady Anon appeared after Couloumbe was appointed Director and disappeared after Couloumbe retired. I’m not implying it was the Director but possibly a relative?
To my knowledge CSIS hasn’t been around since that campaign ended in 2016. Go figure.
Just a reminder. Neither Starnes, nor the members of the Multi-Generational Reitman cult had or currently have one shred of legal authority to do any of the things they and/or their recruits are doing to me at their behest. This includes demanding I be censored. If they have a problem with what I’m saying about them they can sue me for defamation. The reason they won’t do that is because they know I’m telling the truth. They just don’t want anyone else to know. A trial would put it all into the public record.
They are not CSIS. They are not the Police.
They are a Third party engaging in criminal acts every time they target me in some way, including filing false reports to instigate baseless investigations or “disrupt and destroy” campaigns. Those members of CSIS, the Police, Public elected and appointed Officials, government employees, courier, grocery, and take-out delivery people, members of professional associations, like Doctors and Lawyers, etc. that collaborate with them, are also engaging in criminal acts.
Shameless Hypocrisy
I believe the Reitman’s are lying when they tell you the following to rationalize their abuse:
They hate Nazis. They had no problem with Ewan Cameron’s Operation Paperclip campaign to recruit Nazis yet collaborated with him to target Greta Goede who was German but not a Nazi.
They hate communists while collaborating with recent (ex?) opportunist members of CPC (M-L) to target me: not a communist, a soccer mom, Library Cataloguer and later Web and Software Developer.
They hate antisemites while collaborating with Hindutva fascists as well as the white supremacist English Defense League and Sons of Odin.
They hate and don’t associate with pedophiles. They have way too many friends in pedophile circles and recruit from them regularly.
A picture is worth a thousand words:
All of their lies include the same shameless hypocrisy. Deception, bait and switch, misdirection, frame-ups using impersonators, impersonation with fake emails and spoofed phone numbers including spoofing mine, fraud, and inheritance fraud, are just a few of the techniques that are the name of their game.
Bored dilettantes with nothing productive to do, have the luxury of spending their worthless lives committing crimes like this.
If they were serious and intelligent about doing shady things like developing bioweapons there are more discreet ways to do this which don’t include targeted harassment of their victims. Harassment just incites people like me to expose them.
However, psychopaths or sociopaths are always malicious. It’s a key component of their methodology. They want their targets and recruits to know what monsters they are and want to be able to bully everyone into submission and silence to cover up their crimes for them.
Herein lies the second reason why I was, and continue to be, selectively targeted in such an extreme and abusive way.
I raised the alarm very early on, in the early 1980s, that something was wrong and I thought I was being intentionally made sick. I was the first.
A few years later, I discovered a LOT of people connected to CPC(M-L) were suddenly getting sick. Some were diagnosed with cancer, others with chronic fatigue syndrome, hormone issues, or other undiagnosed illnesses and it was all happening at the same time.
Some died early on. Some died eventually. Some were perpetually sick for years. Since I wasn’t involved in those circles, I don’t know how it was resolved or if it ever was. I just know what I heard from the fringes.
I raised the alarm again at that time, and stated unequivocally that I believed we were all being made sick intentionally.
Luckily for Starnes, his fedora/trenchcoat stalking goons and the Multi-Generational Reitman cult, my concerns were DISMISSED. Unfortunately for everyone else, I’ve been proven right.
The only ones who didn’t dismiss them were Starnes and his cohorts because they knew my allegations were true. So, there we have it. The reasons I’ve been their hard target:
Starnes and his goon squads couldn’t control or manipulate me.
I outed their bioweapons campaign.
If Starnes and his cohorts weren’t stupid, they would have realized that since my concerns had been dismissed and no-one was taking me seriously, the smart thing to do would have been to just leave me out of it. I would have just moved on and that would have been the end of it.
That said, let’s not forget that Starnes and Reitman targeted me first, a teenager, before anyone else in the family. So, it was also because this “super spy” and his cohort, Cyril, son of Sam, were, in reality, weak, cowardly little men who liked to pick on vulnerable girls.
I have been treated far worse than any serial killer or terrorist in Canada for most of my life. Not a single member of CPC (M-L), their leadership or families has been targeted in the same extreme way.
Not one.
The only one I’m aware of who’s worse off than me is Julian Assange. Many similar things are being done to him but he is also the hard target of multiple major world governments and their intelligence agencies.
People keep telling me that if I shut up, they might stop.
I did shut up.
For 20+ years I just tried to get on with my life.
They didn’t stop.
I signed an NDA preventing me from suing them, which they violated so it’s now null and void, because they still didn’t stop.
They aren’t going to stop because, in my opinion, they’re psychopaths and sociopaths. I think they get sadistic pleasure out of abusing people and they’re passing their mental derangement on to their younger generations.
For the record, I will not submit to them. Not now. Not ever. No matter what.
If there was any real justice in the world, that entire cult and all of their cohorts and recruits would be in jail.
Coming next, When A Spy Goes Rogue, Conclusion: Building The Mosaic
It looks as if the intention was always to put Greta Goede into the mental health system rather than prison and there are several reasons why those involved might have wanted that:
The mental health system is more faceted than the prison system and in modern democracies it is very hard for a prison to be run as someone's own personal empire, but as the mental health system contains both private and public provision and both care-orientated and research-orientated establishments there are more cracks for someone to fall through (and into the wrong hands) in mental health care than in prison.
And it is much, much harder to separate a prisoner from legal help and advice than it is to separate a mental patient from legal help and advice. Not least because most of one's fellow prisoners will have a pretty fair knowledge of what their rights are and how to get them! And a prison is administered on the assumption that EVERYONE will want and be entitled to professional legal advice at times. A mental hospital, even today, is run on the basis of medical, rather than legal argument and judgement and it is inherently difficult to challenge medical judgements even if legal advice is available. If the judgements against one are purely legal ones, then they are inherently open to scrutiny, challenge and if necessary, appeal. Back in 1958, even the inadequate legal help available to a mental patient in the present day, wasn't available and even now it's not provided in such a robust, accessible and abuse-resistant way as in prison.
Abuse does take place in prisons (and even more so in youth custody centres) , but lessons do get learned (people get let of jail and tell their stories, people believe them, too) and systematic sexual or sadistic abuse of particular individuals by rich and powerful people from outside the institution is most improbable in a prison (where some of the prisoners are likely to be professional blackmailers) and much more likely in a mental institution where disbelief is baked-in to the whole system and it's more normal for individual patients to be isolated from each other.
Such systematic abuse is known to have occurred, over a long period of time when Sir Jimmy Saville had privileged access to Broadmoor secure hospital in Berkshire, England. Prior to which, the management was of its time, but professional and basically well-intentioned. What Saville did was create a situation where the mental health professionals were supplanted by himself and other amateurs. This went completely unquestioned by senior civil servants, mainly because Saville was an expert manipulator and all he needed to know in order to bend the civil servants to his will, was their own definition of a successful institution. (Almost entirely financial!) When an elected minister, Edwina Currie, tried to ask questions she ran up against a brick wall: not because the civil servants knew what he was doing and were helping him out of deliberate evil, but because Saville's manipulative skills also ran to raising huge amounts of money from the general public and this meant every institution that he infiltrated (there were several) looked successful to the civil servants because every statutory duty looked as if it was being delivered within budget and lots of extra activities were being self-funded. Saville did not use money as a bribe: he used it to camouflage maladministration!
In Canada, it looks as if a much higher percentage of mental health funding (especially for "research") comes as gifts from the rich and powerful than is the case in the UK, so the principle of not looking a gift horse in the mouth is going to be even stronger. Taxpayers usually demand that taxpayer's money is accounted for: they can be persuaded that private gifts are none of their business!
Once Greta was in the mental health system, it would have been possible to move her to whichever institution was convenient to her abusers, simply by attaching appropriate charitable funding to her case!
Experiments without informed consent are abusive, even if the professed intent is to benefit mankind in some way. Experiments that serve only the general good and are not in the interests of the subject are still abusive even if that person, for whatever reason, perversely consents to be harmed. And experiments devised outside of proper scientific rigour, scrutiny and peer-review are also inherently abusive, because idle curiosity does not justify risk or harm, or even the use of resources.
So, whilst just using someone in Greta's position as an experimental subject was almost certainly abusive even if that was all that happened, the potential for prolonged and repeated sadistic or sexual abuse was at least as great as at Broadmoor during Saville's reign of terror. The planning and resources that went into Greta's frame-up and incarceration suggest that those involved saw a payoff in it, and it's hard to see what they could have gotten out of it other than personal gratification of a perverse nature. There was no valid science being done, nobody was being protected from harm, the patient was not being healed or helped.