It occurs to me, now that even a UK Parliamentary Committee has written a formal letter saying there was something extremely dodgy about the way the UK regulator approved not only the Covid Vaccines but also other dangerous treatments and interventions going back years, that a family as involved in "medical" research as the Reitmans might have had an interest in paving the way for the plethora of scams perpetrated (often for huge amounts of money, especially from the American taxpayer) during Covid. The recurrent theme, apart from pushing the mRNA vaccines, was discrediting the use of any existing but out of patent (or never patented, like Vitamin D3) treatments which might prove effective. They were able to do this, because none of the firms selling such cheap, out of patent solutions had the financial backing to fight their own corner against the firms pushing the hugely-expensive (and, we now know, largely ineffective) mRNA technology.
But, right up until Barry and Honey Sherman were murdered, one of the richest men in Canada (who was also pretty adept at getting his way in court and knew what fights to pick and what grounds to fight them on) had made his vast fortune out of selling generic out of patent medicines at affordable prices. Mr Sherman didn't kill a single person by doing this, because he was ONLY selling medicines with a well-proven safety and efficacy profile, and quite possibly by focusing prescription practices on medicines that WORKED he was saving more lives, especially of people from low-income households, than we could even calculate.
The war (throughout the Western World) against medicines that actually work only really gained traction after Barry and Honey Sherman were brutally murdered, by individuals who knew about items which they had purchased only the day before. That suggests that the killers had the Shermans' personal devices well and truly loaded with spyware, because the killers knew where to find those very items and use them in the murders. They also knew where Barry hid, probably when he knew his wife was dead or she told him to save himself. They were tracking him and his Blackberry probably had a permanently-open microphone in the days before and the moments right up to his murder.
According to their personal trainer, who was the ONLY person who could have known by any means other than covert surveillance, the pair of cheap leather belts used to hang them.
The level of hatred shown in the murders would normally indicate a personal motive, but if the Shermans were the main obstacle to a really big scam which many rich and powerful people had been working towards for years, the hatred level would have been pretty intense and some of the possible suspects sponsored a lot of research into psychological manipulation, so they knew that if the murders expressed a great deal of hatred and sadism, that would only help the police to go after the relatives rather than Mr Sherman's customary enemies in Big Pharma.
IMO, they were afraid the real scam would be exposed. If the Shermans had a problem with it, they would likely have exposed it and may have said so. Barry Sherman wasn't shy about doing this sort of thing from what I can tell. This would have prompted a quick reaction.
This would also explain why the President left so quickly. He may have been prepared to go along with it and when the Shermans were murdered, left to prevent it from being exposed.
Yes, the afternoon of the day before the murders so there was no time for anyone but the trainer to notice them. They got more fun out of finding cheap stuff they liked than in buying things to impress other rich people with.
After the Shermans were murdered, Apotek lost the Ontario Pharmacare contract to exclusively provide pharmaceuticals for Seniors. A small generic drugs company from Quebec got it: Sandoz.
I'm assuming this because my prescriptions started coming with their name on them. In the interest of transparency I wasn't able to find anything to verify this.
Anyway, this company was purchased by Novartis (global) within months (2018).
Last week Sandoz & Novartis have decided to separate.
It occurs to me, now that even a UK Parliamentary Committee has written a formal letter saying there was something extremely dodgy about the way the UK regulator approved not only the Covid Vaccines but also other dangerous treatments and interventions going back years, that a family as involved in "medical" research as the Reitmans might have had an interest in paving the way for the plethora of scams perpetrated (often for huge amounts of money, especially from the American taxpayer) during Covid. The recurrent theme, apart from pushing the mRNA vaccines, was discrediting the use of any existing but out of patent (or never patented, like Vitamin D3) treatments which might prove effective. They were able to do this, because none of the firms selling such cheap, out of patent solutions had the financial backing to fight their own corner against the firms pushing the hugely-expensive (and, we now know, largely ineffective) mRNA technology.
But, right up until Barry and Honey Sherman were murdered, one of the richest men in Canada (who was also pretty adept at getting his way in court and knew what fights to pick and what grounds to fight them on) had made his vast fortune out of selling generic out of patent medicines at affordable prices. Mr Sherman didn't kill a single person by doing this, because he was ONLY selling medicines with a well-proven safety and efficacy profile, and quite possibly by focusing prescription practices on medicines that WORKED he was saving more lives, especially of people from low-income households, than we could even calculate.
The war (throughout the Western World) against medicines that actually work only really gained traction after Barry and Honey Sherman were brutally murdered, by individuals who knew about items which they had purchased only the day before. That suggests that the killers had the Shermans' personal devices well and truly loaded with spyware, because the killers knew where to find those very items and use them in the murders. They also knew where Barry hid, probably when he knew his wife was dead or she told him to save himself. They were tracking him and his Blackberry probably had a permanently-open microphone in the days before and the moments right up to his murder.
Interesting comment: "by individuals who knew about items which they had purchased only the day before."
What items did Honey and Barry Sherman purchase the day before?
What's the story there?
According to their personal trainer, who was the ONLY person who could have known by any means other than covert surveillance, the pair of cheap leather belts used to hang them.
The level of hatred shown in the murders would normally indicate a personal motive, but if the Shermans were the main obstacle to a really big scam which many rich and powerful people had been working towards for years, the hatred level would have been pretty intense and some of the possible suspects sponsored a lot of research into psychological manipulation, so they knew that if the murders expressed a great deal of hatred and sadism, that would only help the police to go after the relatives rather than Mr Sherman's customary enemies in Big Pharma.
Yes I agree with your assessment.
IMO, they were afraid the real scam would be exposed. If the Shermans had a problem with it, they would likely have exposed it and may have said so. Barry Sherman wasn't shy about doing this sort of thing from what I can tell. This would have prompted a quick reaction.
This would also explain why the President left so quickly. He may have been prepared to go along with it and when the Shermans were murdered, left to prevent it from being exposed.
Assuming my analysis is correct.
The belts were purchased by the Shermans?
Yes, the afternoon of the day before the murders so there was no time for anyone but the trainer to notice them. They got more fun out of finding cheap stuff they liked than in buying things to impress other rich people with.
Yes they seemed to be very down to earth that way which makes them quite likable to someone like me :)
After the Shermans were murdered, Apotek lost the Ontario Pharmacare contract to exclusively provide pharmaceuticals for Seniors. A small generic drugs company from Quebec got it: Sandoz.
I'm assuming this because my prescriptions started coming with their name on them. In the interest of transparency I wasn't able to find anything to verify this.
Anyway, this company was purchased by Novartis (global) within months (2018).
Last week Sandoz & Novartis have decided to separate.
Sandoz now operates globally: https://pharmaphorum.com/news/sandoz-separates-novartis-valued-just-over-11bn
Essentially Novartis bought them just in time for the big scam, made billions and is now moving on.
Meanwhile Sandoz is expanding into something called "biosimilar" drugs. When the lingo changes like that I start to question what is going on.
I assume Sandoz still has the Ontario contract but since I haven't bought any prescriptions I'm not sure.
Now, THAT really is a useful piece of information! Thank you.