The Psychological Abuse of Systemic Criminal Harassment
What is the point of all of this? From the top down.
Both of my SpyStack series, When a Spy Goes Rogue and The Psychopathic Puppet Masters, have focused on:
Explaining Systemic Criminal Harassment and its perpetrators from a psychological perspective
Giving the facts of my situation
Giving the facts of another similar situation
Demonstrating through these facts that such campaigns require a Conspiracy of Corrupt Abusers of Power to happen with or without official sanction; such conspiracies do occur; and have occurred repeatedly
Providing an analysis based on facts and evidence in the context of the psychology involved.
The reason I took this approach is to demonstrate that covert harassment is a psychological strategy developed through years of illegal non-consensual experimentation and whose purpose is to act as a cover for other types of illegal non-consensual experimentation like behavioural control, social/mind control, electronic weapons, bioweapons, chemical weapons, etc.
Since 9/11, it has also begun to be used as a weapon to target activists, on its own or as a cover for dirty tricks campaigns, as well as various types of social control/manipulation through propaganda and psyops, etc.
This work, was conducted by MI6 and the CIA in their various MKULTRA and related projects, some of which also occurred in Canada in the 1950s and were funded by the CIA, the Canadian government, and wealthy individuals. In more recent years, GCHQs Cyber Warfare and harassment research has been developed based on this previous research.
These programs laid the foundation for and established the techniques used in Criminal Harassment campaigns. The American Epstein cult added the Systemic component using both the carrot and stick as leverage and to establish control over key people in key positions.
Systemic: relating to or affecting the whole of a system, organization, etc. rather than just some parts of it
These techniques were never intended to be used against foreign enemies or even enemies of the state.
They were developed for domestic use and their purpose is to:
Suppress any kind of dissent. It doesn’t matter whether the dissent is coming from activists in the left/middle/right, or the average person in their dealings with unfair corporations. Nor does it matter whether the dissent is peaceful or not.
Silence those who expose corruption, abuse of power and other wrong-doings by the state, corporations, institutions, wealthy individuals, or anyone these entities consider “important”.
Set an example to the general public to discourage anyone who is considering engaging in item 1 or 2.
This is how they are actually being used.
Canadians got their first bitter taste of this on a mass scale during the Pandemic fiasco and the targeting of Freedom Convoy Protests, protestors and supporters.
British activists are being charged under Domestic Terrorism laws despite the fact that they’ve only engaged in peaceful dissent and have not committed violent terrorist acts like bombings, etc.
Globally, activists and journalists are being subjected to LawFare and Assassinations, which are all component parts of Systemic Criminal Harassment.
LawFare: legal action undertaken as part of a hostile campaign against a country or group [or individuals KH]
Examples of individuals targeted by LawFare: Julian Assange and other journalists, globally, for exposing war crimes and corruption; Stephen Donziger, lawyer who took Chevron Oil to court on behalf of the First Nations people in Latin America and won; Canadian Freedom Convoy activists like Tamara Lich and many others, including supporters; Canadian Police officers like Detective Helen Grus for daring to investigate infant deaths related to the C19 jab; Globally, numerous medical professionals who objected to non-consensual medical experimentation and other medical rights violations, and many more.
It’s these techniques of Systemic Criminal Harassment that are also being used against me but not because it was an “experiment”; not because they were trying to cover up “experimenting” on me; and not because they had any intention of contributing to developing the techniques.
If they are making any of these claims and if they used them to get funding, they lied to their benefactors and committed fraud.
The techniques already existed. They just copied them and were more extremist and abusive in how they implemented them.
I believe Starnes and Reitman were making all of these claims. If not, why coerce me into signing a form to participate in an unexplained, undated experiment (which presumably makes it perpetual) when I was in college? I couldn’t graduate from my college program without signing that form.
That’s forceful coercion, not passive and not considered legitimate consent.
If this “experiment” was sanctioned by the government that would mean the government committed an illegal act since coercion is not equal to consent, and if Starnes and the Reitman’s received government and/or private funding for their “experiment”, that would make it fraud since nothing came out of it and nothing was intended to come out of it. They were just copying established techniques.
The fact that they also incorporated Ku Klux Klan methods simply indicates that they are also a group of hard-core racists and supremacists. Other evidence of that is their support for and recruiting of groups like EDL, SOO, JDL, the Hindutva fascists, etc. in their hate campaigns.
The Systemic Criminal Harassment campaign targeting me was and continues to be nothing more than a punishment for not allowing myself to be exploited, sexually and otherwise, by the Starnes/Reitman cult of perverts and pedos aka Canada’s Epsteins.
This cult is/was a group of psychopaths, sociopaths and narcissists playing cartoon caricatures of “spies” as a cover for their personal desire to engage in sadistic abuse, corruption, and abuse of power.
If they wanted to play spy games, there are and were plenty of real spies in Canada.
They aren’t interested.
This began during Canada’s Cold War era and there were plenty of real communists they could have targeted as well.
They weren’t interested.
Instead, they stalk and systemically criminally harass/abuse a soccer mom, uninvolved in politics or activism, for most of the 50+ years they’ve been doing this to me.
They specifically came after my immediate family and managed to compromise everyone, in one way or another, with the exception of me. Those they recruited in my extended family to participate in the targeting, were closely tied to CPC(ML).
None of my immediate family were involved in politics or activism other than my older brother, who, like me, was only involved for a short period of time. My dad had died by then and my dad was the only one with a long history of being an active communist.
So, why my family and me instead of my uncle’s family, assuming the cult isn’t a bunch of liars when they claim to be targeting communists? He founded CPC(ML) and numerous other organizations internationally. His wife and most of his kids were active in politics or at least closely connected to CPC(ML).
Neither I nor anyone in my immediate family were leading lights in the communist movement in Canada.
Just to be clear, I’m not suggesting they should have targeted my uncle’s family.
I’m simply pointing out that they didn’t. CSIS probably did but the Starnes/Reitman cult didn’t. They recruited them. So, I’m wondering why?
When someone or a group of someone’s statements are inconsistent with their actions it usually means they’re lying and their real motivations and agenda are something else.
Whatever it is, the reality is that I represent their failure in their sick little “experiment” and that’s not something psychopaths, sociopaths and narcissists can handle.
They couldn’t compromise me, so they’ve been having a 50+ year, multi-generational temper tantrum where they have resorted to punishing me instead.
From the time they forced me to move into their home base of Toronto, Ontario in 2000, by ensuring I couldn’t get a job anywhere else, it took them hundreds of thousands of dollars (likely more), 16 years, two corrupted police chiefs with associated corrupted cops, an illegal CSIS disrupt and destroy campaign, corrupted Premiers, MPPs and associated corrupted government officials and staff, corrupted Legal, Medical, Dental, Psychological and Pharmaceutical Associations and associated professionals, a corrupted Mayor to isolate me, remove my ability to access services, and enable constant abuses of my person, my life and my civil rights.
The playing field was and continues to be uneven. They had and have every possible advantage including apparently endless financial resources, yet it took all of the above and they still haven’t fully succeeded.
Over the entire 50+ years period the costs had to have run into the millions. Just to target me.
I’m not completely isolated in real life or in the cyber world. I’m still standing and have a semblance of a life. They haven’t broken me.
If the playing field had been even, these criminal fools wouldn’t have lasted six months.
Even now, the Superintendent of my apartment building, Ann East, a member of the Stuckless pedophile circle, is so paranoid that I might have connections in the building that she’s setting the stage to have a camera placed outside my apartment. She consistently uses the method of:
Create the problem (this includes falsely accusing me of creating it or being it)
Provide the solution (usually an additional means of invading my privacy so that she can continue to stalk me, create problems, and falsely accuse me of doing things I haven’t done, as part of the smear campaign)
Ann, as well as her predecessor and pal, Brada Stuckless, have used this method in the past, repeatedly, to justify getting cameras placed everywhere in the building as well as to use computerized fobs (which Ann controls) to access the building.
The cameras allowed Ann to camera stalk me in the building. The computerized access allows Ann get alerted when someone buzzes me, and she can then check the cameras to see who’s coming to my apartment.
This is also how she interferes with my deliveries and compromises my delivery people. Whenever she feels like harassing me, she disconnects my buzzer so that my delivery people can’t contact me to be let into the apartment. When this happens, they phone me and I have to go downstairs and let them in. This weekend (Nov. 18, 2023) not only was the buzzer disconnected but the elevator was locked allegedly because of a move.
My health issues make mobility difficult and Ann is well aware of that fact. So, not only did I have to go downstairs, I had to struggle with the stairs to do it.
Oddly, you couldn’t hear any actual action in the elevator of anyone actually moving. Just a rapidly hand-written sign taped by the elevator on the main floor that it was locked for a 2 hour move. Usually, the sign is a computer print out and it’s taped by the elevator on every floor.
And, oddly, she knew the delivery person was coming before they arrived.
The camera stalking gave her lies credibility, allowed her to frame me for things I didn’t do; know which garbage is mine so that she can go through it to snoop and use items in her frame ups; as well as let her know when I’m doing my laundry so that she (or one of her cohorts) can damage it in some way: dropping bits of brown dye into my white wash, making it look dingy (I’ve observed this being done directly on two occasions), making tiny cuts in my towels so that they’re ruined after a few washes, etc.
However, it looks like the landlord may have taken control of those cameras away from her when he hired the private security firm. One of the services they offer is to monitor the cameras and access to the building. She still has control over access to the building with the computerized fobs since she continues to know when people are buzzing me.
If the private security firm took control of the cameras, then her ability to camera stalk and harass me has been compromised so she needs another way to do it.
It would explain her change in tactics: Using tenants in the building that she knows, to spy on my movements with peep hole spy cameras, and share the information with her, restores her control.
She’s already convinced the tenant in 306 to do this based on her weaponized lies. Yes, I know this for a fact.
306 is one apartment down the hall and across from the garbage chute. I have to pass it when tossing my garbage. Ann was lying and claiming that I was dropping pizza boxes into the chute which were allegedly damaging the compressor. This lie was likely intended to upset the landlord and encourage him to remove the compressor (just a guess).
She can’t blame me for damaging the compressor if she doesn’t know when I’ve dumped my garbage. She can’t manipulate the landlord into not using the compressor without a good reason. And she can’t go through my garbage while the compressor is being used.
Unfortunately for her, the private security company discovered it was one of her friends who was dropping pizza boxes into the garbage chute. The man in apartment 310, across the hall, so she got caught in her lie. Then she recruited the couple in apartment 306 and installed a peephole spy camera in their door, so that she would know when I tossed out my garbage and could be sure she wouldn’t get caught in another lie again.
I’m assuming they’ve now added cameras to the rooms on each floor where the garbage chute is located, or perhaps just on my floor. Otherwise, how would they even know that he was the one doing it.
The garbage is still being compressed so she still has to convince the landlord that I’m doing something to damage the compressor so that he’ll stop using it.
And, she still has to fabricate a reason by “creating a problem” so that she can get the man in 310 to let her install a peephole spy camera on his door to monitor my visitors and activity directly. 310 is across the hall from me. They don’t seem that happy with each other these days so whether he’ll go along with it or not is anyone’s guess. If all was well, she could have installed the peephole camera on his door in the first place rather than approaching apartment 306. Then she would only have needed one.
Yes, they go to these ridiculously absurd lengths to stir things up for me and invade my privacy.
No, she isn’t smart enough to come up with this BS on her own.
I believe she’s working directly with Sam Reitman (given his past appearance pretending to be a worker needing access to my apartment). I suspect a corrupt cop, Sergeant Christopher French, in Peel Regional Police’s Community Policing Division is also involved. French used to stalk me just before my car insurance was due and issue false traffic tickets which ensured my insurance rates stayed high.
In my opinion, all three are hard-core racists and supremacists.
Even without an even playing field, I have a mountain of circumstantial evidence and some hard evidence supporting my allegations against the Starnes/Reitman cult of perverts and pedos.
All that’s missing is smoking gun type of evidence.
That’s a lot more than they had when Greta Goede was falsely imprisoned on nothing but Reitman and a taxi drivers’ “testimony” which was uncorroborated by any forensic or other hard evidence. The Reitman’s were extremely generous in rewarding the taxi driver and his wife after it was all over though.
Perjury pays well.
The snag with using covert surveillance to construct credible lies about someone is that the perp is creating proof that they are engaged in illegal surveillance. I wonder if that thought has occurred to any of the people involved?
BTW: it is also pretty obvious that whoever murdered Barry and Honey Sherman knew too much about their most recent movements and purchases for them NOT to have been subjecting the Shermans to a very similar level of surveillance. The limited opportunities and substantial resources involved ought to narrow down the list of possible suspects quite nicely, and yet... no charges or even hints of charges!
Stalkers must always be suspects in murders simply because of how much they know about their own victims and quite possibly the victims of other stalkers. If there's no smoking gun, there might very well be some smoking dox.