Gaslighting: “Gaslighting, also called coercive control, historically referred to extreme psychological manipulation to commit an individual to a psychiatric institution or cause mental illness with the intent to brainwash.
In contemporary language, gaslighting is a colloquialism describing the subjective experience of having one's reality repeatedly questioned by another.” -Wikipedia
“The practice of psychologically manipulating someone into questioning their own sanity, memory, or powers of reasoning.” -Oxford Dictionary
Contemporary language tends to reflect the misuse of a term when it “softens” the definition. Real gaslighting is about coercive control, extreme psychological manipulation and is considered torture.
The entire “Kitty is a liar” campaign implemented by the Starnes/Reitman cult of perverts and pedos, and their cybermercenary flunkies, is a gaslighting campaign.
Whether it’s by removing historical information on the Internet that I talk about in relation to the cult, or changing my government records, or manipulating my kids into spreading stories which are incomplete, out of context and misrepresent their own experiences with me and others. This is done by adjusting the narrative to make me look bad, or focusing on just one part of it. They “forget” to mention what led to it, what their role in it was, exaggerate what happened and/or claim that a single incident “occur(ed/s) all the time”.
Isolating and discrediting me with smears and hate spin has laid the foundation for the Gaslighting campaign.
The end goal of isolating and discrediting me is to prevent people from hearing my side of the story and if they do hear it, they think that I “deserve it” and/or that I’m a “liar”.
The purpose of the gaslighting portion is to make me look “crazy” and/or look like a “liar” by making claims that can’t be supported because they’ve had the evidence erased, replaced by contradictory or different information, the narrative spun into hate spin, or statements I’ve made misrepresented. In other words, they are the ones changing the information and then calling me a liar after they’ve lied by changing things.
I’ve seen this in action as I’ve been writing these articles and if you’ve been following the links and references, you’ve seen it too.
They claim that I deserve to be abused because I’m allegedly an “evil communist/terrorist” while they ally with people who were/are(?) opportunistic members of the Central Committee of CPC (M-L) up until recently, in order to target me.
Both Manny Gitterman and his partner Indira Nunner, who is my cousin, are (or until recently were) Marxist-Leninists. To be clear, I don’t know what relationship either Indira or Manny currently have with CPC (M-L). However, as of the early 2000s, they were still active, so they were involved a lot longer and at a higher level than I ever was.
Yet Manny is/was(?) employed by Joel Reitman in his shady Bridgepoint Medical Research Project and previously worked at CAMH with/for(?) Jill Reitman.
So, I must ask, which is it? Do the Reitman’s hate communists or not? If they hate communists then why are they targeting me, someone who they know isn’t a communist, and wasn’t at the time they targeted me (there was no CPC(M-L) in 1969) instead of my cousin who was a member of the Central Committee of CPC (M-L) for around 20 years, if not longer, and may still be. Instead, they establish an alliance with her and her partner to target me from within my family.
Why the hypocrisy?
The Bridgepoint web site, until as recently as this year, showed Manny Gitterman as the Manager. Now, the web site has a new url. Manny is removed and his LinkedIn shows him as ending his position there in 2018. Until recently there was no end date listed with that position.
This looks like yet another Reitman cheap gaslighting trick. It’s a cheap technical trick which I’ll explain in my book, but essentially, it makes the site falsely appear as though it contained the new site content from 2021 in the Internet Archive (see screenshots below). It didn’t.
Organizations don’t leave a person on their web site for FIVEyears (or even THREE) when they are no longer employed by them.
Why play these games? What are they trying to hide?
Even if I gave them the benefit of the doubt and assumed it was true that Manny only worked there from 2014 to 2018 and the website was “just a mistake”, what would it change?
Would that make my assessment that the Reitmans, Manny and Indira are collaborators in this hate campaign against me, wrong? Of course not. It changes nothing. The connection is what matters, it’s proven, and it is what supports my claim that they’re collaborators.
The only thing the website changes accomplish is that the Reitman’s can claim I’m “crazy” and a “liar” because I’m allegedly wrong about the website which they changed only recently. That’s called gaslighting and apparently Joel Reitman’s wife, Jill, a psychologist, thinks gaslighting is “fun”. So, I’m not even surprised by this turn of events.
Internet Archive Nov. 2021 screenshot:
My screenshot of the website taken on January 11, 2021, is below. It doesn’t appear now in the Internet Archive but was there in the past. Go figure.
[KH COMMENT: Note that Manny is listed and the header is different. My screenshot shows what the site looked like until this year.
And Google cached that 2023 page here. You’re seeing it with the new header because of the technical trick I mentioned earlier:
So even though you can’t access it from the web site. The proof of its existence and its removal IN 2023 remains for now (scroll down on the linked version and note the 2023 copyright date at the bottom of the page). This is why I love the Internet! -KH]
My original screenshots of the site which showed only Joel as the founder, Manny as the Manager, and explained in detail the shady research being conducted into “complex medical conditions”, were, conveniently for Joel and Manny, deleted from my computer by cybermercenary hackers engaging in an MITM attack.
[The description of the research has also gone from research into “complex medical conditions” to “designing systems to handle the management of complex medical conditions”. They can’t even make up their minds about what they’re researching. KH]
I checked again today, just before posting this article. The site has changed again now to make the header look like the old one but without the same content and the url no longer forwards to the new url. It’s now pretending to be the old site but contains different content which matches the new site.
I don’t doubt it will change again. Lol. The cheap tricks are many and obvious.
“What a tangled web you weave, when first you practice to deceive.” Sir Walter Scott
I changed the word “we” to “you”. I have no need to deceive.
NOTE: The above quote from the original article has been edited in some parts for clarity. My additional comments appear in “[…]”.
Example 2
In my article, When A Spy Goes Rogue, Pt 6: Murder and Mayhem, I refer to Jules Grajower’s failed attempt to sexually torture and murder me. A month later, almost all references to Jules Grajower on the Internet were removed or have become unavailable.
Grajower was originally a member of the Anti-Imperialist Alliance, which later merged with CPC(ML). The Anti-Imperialist Alliance had influence in the official University of Waterloo student newspaper, The Chevron. It later became known as the Free Chevron when the University tried to shut them down in an attempt to curtail free speech and journalism on campus.
They were eventually replaced by a Student Council controlled hack rag called the Imprint now renamed the Chevron again.
The back issues of the old Chevron and the newer versions of the paper, were very recently (last couple of months) purchased by a company called Issuu.com who are restricting access to them.
Am I surprised by this? No. Everything that can independently verify my story is gradually being removed or hidden on the Web including Grajowers’ existence.
Why hide the Chevron material? Because I suspect it calls into question whether Grajower was actually the “mentally ill schizophrenic” he portrayed himself as being. Or was he just pretending to be one in order to escape accountability for the crimes he attempted to commit against me as part of Operation Checkmate.
That said, it may well, miraculously and coincidentally, become available when I publish just so that I can be falsely accused of “lying”, yet again.
Example 3
Another article which contains the image of my false arrest and its context has also disappeared. The site was purchased by another site which doesn’t appear to have an archive of any of the old articles. This is the only reference to this article left and will also probably “disappear”:
When you click on the link you get this:
From the perspective of my story, the full article proves that the following image is a legitimate newspaper image from the era, about an event that actually occurred. It confirms that the event was sponsored by the Canadian Council of Christians and Jews as does this tweet.
Both Dorothy Reitman and Lorna Marsden were members of the Canadian Council of Christians and Jews in 1973, when the event occurred for the first time, as well as members of the Starnes/Reitman cult. So, their membership in the Council is an interesting omission from both of their Wikipedia pages. Other references to their membership in this organization that I’ve seen in the past have also “disappeared”.
The actual newspaper issue and the article that went with it is also conveniently “missing” from public newspaper archives that I’ve been able to access. My copy on the right is better because it’s a scan from the original newspaper which I clipped at the time. The left appears to be a microfiche copy the Historicist located. So the newspaper archives had that issue as recently as 2016.
The men were identified in the article as David Boothby (who later became Toronto Police Chief) and Sergeant Sexsmith (unverified, but most likely a relative of Murray Sexsmith, Deputy Director of the RCMP Security Service at that time). The man in the middle wasn’t identified and I’ve never been able to identify him.
Example 4
When police records were computerized, the Starnes/Reitman cultists took advantage of a mistake I made in a TV interview with Jack Webster, a popular Vancouver interviewer. I was extremely nervous and when he asked me if I had a police record or not, I mistakenly stated the conviction was for assault.
It wasn’t.
I was charged with common assault, assault with a dangerous weapon (my flag), and causing a disturbance at the Anti-Police Brutalityprotest which was protesting the “Cops are Tops” rally and is depicted in the image above. I was unceremoniously carted off by the three men who never identified themselves as cops, and as the result of a set-up.
Murray Sexsmith, Deputy-Director of the RCMP SS, grabbed my flag and swung it through the crowd while claiming I was attacking people. This was the other cops excuse to arrest me. The reason I believe it was him is because he was wearing a distinctive jacket that matched a distinctive hat he was photographed wearing in the following image. The jacket was described in an article at the time which I submitted to the court, and I observed it myself. The court rejected my submission because I made it during my testimony instead of submitting it before I testified.
This frame-up and arrest were part of Operation Checkmate.
I was only convicted of “Causing a disturbance” and fined $25. If I had a lawyer with me (I didn’t) it’s highly unlikely I would have even been convicted of that.
“Causing a disturbance” is and was a Summary offence, not an Indictable offence like “Common assault” or “Assault with a dangerous weapon” and is not considered serious. I was told by the Judge at the time that it would be cleared automatically after 5(?) years or so.
When police records were computerized, my police record was illegallychanged from a Summary conviction of “Causing a disturbance” to an Indictable conviction of “Common assault”.
Of course, any cop with more than two brain cells working together should have realized this was wrong since they IMPRISON people for Indictable convictions. They FINE them for Summary convictions.
This illegal falsification of my police record ensured that it would never be cleared and since assault is a violent offence, it can prevent travel to other countries like the US as well as cause other issues.
Note that David Boothby (left, in the image above) was Toronto Police Chief from 1995 to 2000 and was replaced by Julian Fantino (2000-2005), an active member of the Starnes/Reitman cult to date. Boothby became Superintendent of Toronto’s downtown 52 Division in the 1980s. This is the period the records were most likely changed although it’s possible it was later or during Fantinos “reign” as Toronto Police Chief. The arrest occurred in 52 Division and Boothby was allegedly just a beat cop at the time. However, I have unverified reason to believe that both he and Sergeant Sexsmith were actually members of Toronto’s Red Squad.
In the United States, the Red Squad was a police intelligence unit specializing in infiltrating, conducting countermeasures, and gathering intelligence on political and social groups in the 20th century.
A similar unit was established in Canada during this time, but only the Toronto Police, led by Chief Dennis Draper, used the name. -Encyclopedia, Science News & Research Reviews
Example 5
When I moved to Ottawa, I underwent a security check at a Temp agency which hired for Libraries, in 1992. Most libraries in Ottawa are government libraries, so this was necessary. I was asked to provide my fingerprints in order to allegedly exclude or confirm that I was someone who was being investigated at the time.
I cooperated and since my fingerprints DIDN’T match, I was cleared. I was told this directly by the person doing the background check.
When the fingerprint process was computerized, I had to go and provide my prints again in order to get my police record for the BVI job in 2008 (which later turned out to be questionable). I applied for another government job after this, and this time I WASN’T cleared.
So, I’m assuming that a miracle occurred and the fingerprints now matched after nearly 20 years.
While there are many advantages to computerization of records, the disadvantage is that it becomes much easier to illegally include false information or to change information in those records by compromising the people who work with them.
You don’t have to hack government systems in Canada. You just need enough money and connections to bribe with favours or cash the data entry clerk and their boss.
There are ways of proving tampering like this has occurred, but it’s not something they bother to do even though it’s their legal responsibility to ensure these records are accurate.
Paper records go through too many physical hands, and there are usually multiple copies in different physical locations, making it difficult to change them without their being a record of the change in those multiple physical locations.
The purpose of the Access to Information Act was to allow Canadians to monitor and correct their records but the government over-complicated the processes making it difficult to access them, and now you even have officials illegally refusing access to those documents. That’s happened to me on two occasions now.
These and other examples in my other articles are just a small part of thousands of bits and pieces of evidence collected over 50+ years, most with Starnes and/or Reitman connections, that form the fabric of my claims regarding this Epstein cult style organization.
The fact that these liars can convince others to back up their lies is simply testimony to the fact that people are gullible, easily intimidated, or self-serving (they have their own personal stake in backing up a lie or lies).
Truth isn’t determined by multiple liars anymore than science is determined by consensus. If either of these statements were true then we’d still believe the earth was flat.
Galileo went to prison for standing up for scientific truth.
Many others have suffered at the hands of the liars for challenging them with the truth.
THIS is Gaslighting in action.
So, who are the REAL LIARS?
Going to these extreme lengths to cover up their targeting of me and this bizarre multi generational obsession with me and my kids is CRAZY behaviour by any definition, in my opinion.
The Starnes/Reitman cult of perverts and pedos aka Canada’s Epsteins have a lot to hide and their irrational behaviour is inexplicable by any rational standard.
Reminder: I’ve never done anything to these nutbars, other than write articles like this exposing their abuses of me and the system. And I didn’t start publishing these kinds of articles until 2010. 40 years after this BS began.
So, if they’re whining and playing the victims, it’s just another one of their many lies to cover up their and their progenitors abuses against me and my children.
If they moved on, got the hell out of my and my children’s lives, and minded their own business, I wouldn’t have anything to write about.
In England and Wales "coercive control" isn't a dictionary definition: it is now a criminal offence; at least one serving police officer has been convicted of this.
In the past few years, some American civil rights groups have been claiming that legal and investment firms are effectively offering a service whereby local and student newspaper archives can be taken out of the public domain if they hold something that an offender or his family is willing to pay money to censor.
This came to light when a college newspaper contained an allegation of rape against a rich student who subsequently became much richer: the defunct paper's assets, including the archive, were purchased for a pretty nominal fee (a lot less than the legal costs of a defamation suit) and the new owners simply declined to allow any access to the archives at all, even to unconnected material.
It was also clear, some years ago, that whenever the "Cornbread Mafia" in Kentucky wanted to obscure a matter of public record, the relevant dates in newspaper archives would be changed to the wrong month or even year, so that journalists and other researchers, or even Federal agents, would have great difficulty in tracking down the official records; or even the empty space left behind when the official records were destroyed.
As for people disappearing from the internet overnight:
more than a decade ago, there was a Russian blogger called "Eva" who used to try and befriend victims of the sort of gangstalking and gaslighting which the Reitmans and the Cornbreads practice, in order to brainwash them into accepting that they were victims of a "NATO Intelligence" plot. They were victims of a plot alright, but why, exactly, did it have to be a NATO plot and not a Reitman plot, a Cornbread plot, an FBI plot or a CIA plot?
After noticing one evening that successive comments from "Eva" on Medawar's Cornflakes had been posted, within a few minutes of each other, from four different IPs in widely-separated parts of Germany, Medawar innocently pointed out, in a blog comment, just how unlikely it was that a small group of deskbound satellite imaging experts in Brussels would be interested in stalking people around LA, Skane (Sweden), Toronto, Harrodsburg (Kentucky), Eagle Island (in the Carolinas) and so on. Could it not be the case that "NATO Intelligence" simply had "NATO" in its title and that there was one organisation in particular funded to create and feed anti-NATO sentiment and theories. How long, therefore, had Eva been working for the FSB?
Within 24 hours, every trace of "Eva" had vanished from the internet. At least four different people wrote and posted as "Eva" either to an agreed script, or one handed down by their superiors. It was also painfully obvious that none of them was female!
A few years later, the same thumbnail portrait that Eva had used popped up again, on a blog, supposedly by a South American blogger, giving lots of economic facts and figures about Argentina which may have been pretty light on actual facts.
Medawar can't swear to this, but Eva's portrait reminded him of one of the political/religious prisoners (Galina Barats-Kokhan) who was incarcerated with the poet Irina Ratushkinskaya in the "small zone" concentration camp in Moldova during the Gorbachev era. Irina and all her fellow small zone prisoners are now dead, largely because all their food was deliberately doctored with excess salt until their kidneys were damaged. The KGB/FSB took their freedom, and perhaps even in some cases their faces.
In England and Wales "coercive control" isn't a dictionary definition: it is now a criminal offence; at least one serving police officer has been convicted of this.
In the past few years, some American civil rights groups have been claiming that legal and investment firms are effectively offering a service whereby local and student newspaper archives can be taken out of the public domain if they hold something that an offender or his family is willing to pay money to censor.
This came to light when a college newspaper contained an allegation of rape against a rich student who subsequently became much richer: the defunct paper's assets, including the archive, were purchased for a pretty nominal fee (a lot less than the legal costs of a defamation suit) and the new owners simply declined to allow any access to the archives at all, even to unconnected material.
It was also clear, some years ago, that whenever the "Cornbread Mafia" in Kentucky wanted to obscure a matter of public record, the relevant dates in newspaper archives would be changed to the wrong month or even year, so that journalists and other researchers, or even Federal agents, would have great difficulty in tracking down the official records; or even the empty space left behind when the official records were destroyed.
As for people disappearing from the internet overnight:
more than a decade ago, there was a Russian blogger called "Eva" who used to try and befriend victims of the sort of gangstalking and gaslighting which the Reitmans and the Cornbreads practice, in order to brainwash them into accepting that they were victims of a "NATO Intelligence" plot. They were victims of a plot alright, but why, exactly, did it have to be a NATO plot and not a Reitman plot, a Cornbread plot, an FBI plot or a CIA plot?
After noticing one evening that successive comments from "Eva" on Medawar's Cornflakes had been posted, within a few minutes of each other, from four different IPs in widely-separated parts of Germany, Medawar innocently pointed out, in a blog comment, just how unlikely it was that a small group of deskbound satellite imaging experts in Brussels would be interested in stalking people around LA, Skane (Sweden), Toronto, Harrodsburg (Kentucky), Eagle Island (in the Carolinas) and so on. Could it not be the case that "NATO Intelligence" simply had "NATO" in its title and that there was one organisation in particular funded to create and feed anti-NATO sentiment and theories. How long, therefore, had Eva been working for the FSB?
Within 24 hours, every trace of "Eva" had vanished from the internet. At least four different people wrote and posted as "Eva" either to an agreed script, or one handed down by their superiors. It was also painfully obvious that none of them was female!
A few years later, the same thumbnail portrait that Eva had used popped up again, on a blog, supposedly by a South American blogger, giving lots of economic facts and figures about Argentina which may have been pretty light on actual facts.
Medawar can't swear to this, but Eva's portrait reminded him of one of the political/religious prisoners (Galina Barats-Kokhan) who was incarcerated with the poet Irina Ratushkinskaya in the "small zone" concentration camp in Moldova during the Gorbachev era. Irina and all her fellow small zone prisoners are now dead, largely because all their food was deliberately doctored with excess salt until their kidneys were damaged. The KGB/FSB took their freedom, and perhaps even in some cases their faces.