Disclaimer: Please note, I’m not a clinical psychologist and therefore not qualified to make psychological assessments of individuals. This article (and this entire substack) consists of my personal opinions on this and other topics based on my personal experiences and related research.
The Puppet Master is a psychopath looking for real power in the wider society as a whole, or in a large corporation, institution or organization. They have a particular affinity for Executive positions as well as the upper-level echelons in Military, Intelligence, and Policing agencies. These are all positions where absolute power can be exercised internally and strong influence externally, in society at large, to varying degrees.
Most, if not all, of the Globalists appear to be the real Puppet Master Psychopaths. People like Schwab and his cohorts are just their Puppet Psychopaths while playing the role of Puppet Master in their particular circle of Psychopaths. Schwab doesn’t make the decisions. He implements them by influencing other potential puppets.
The real decisions are made by the real Puppet Masters in venues like Bilderberg.
In support of these Globalist Puppet Masters, the Israeli extremists came up with the concept of the Epstein cults which were established by both Israeli Military Intelligence and Mossad. Their purpose according to Ari Ben Menashe, ex-Israeli Military Intelligence, was to compromise politicians so that they could control political policy in the countries they were active in.
“…Ben-Menashe revealed his understanding of why Epstein was eventually shepherded into acting as a professional sexual blackmailer on behalf of Israeli military intelligence. Per Ben-Menashe, there were concerns among Israeli intelligence figures that, following the Reagan Era, a new president would push for Israel to make peace with the Palestinians, something those officials sought to avoid by any means necessary….
Thus, Ben-Menashe argues, when Bill Clinton’s candidacy in the 1992 U.S. Presidential election became clear, efforts were made to target him via sexual blackmail and Jeffrey Epstein was chosen for that purpose. Bill Clinton was eventually blackmailed by the state of Israel and his administration was also targeted by Israeli espionage as part of the “Mega” spy scandal. Epstein’s involvement in the Clinton administration and his visits to the White House date back to Clinton’s first year in office.” Former Spy Details Israel’s Main Motive Behind Epstein’s Sexual Blackmail Operation. Mint Press News.
The Starnes/Reitman cult appear to have decided to take on that role in Canada and in Canadian politics, with John Kennett Starnes as the Puppet Master for this particular circle of psychopaths, sociopaths, narcissists and pedophiles.
Is it a coincidence that Joel Reitman was the person behind the founding of CJPAC, Canada’s Israeli Lobby?
Is it a coincidence that after the Reitman’s bought a condo in Florida in approximately 2004, that suddenly the Florida Police began to take complaints about Epstein seriously, leading to his eventual arrest and death, when they had ignored numerous complaints previously?
Is it a coincidence that Toronto Dominion Bank purchased Epstein’s bank accounts? A Bank that has collaborated with the Reitman’s in the past.
Was this an attempted move to take over the US Epstein operation by getting Epstein out of the way?
While the US Epstein operation did have Canadians like Ed Bronfman and Conrad Black, listed in Epstein’s black book, they don’t appear to have involved themselves to any great degree in Canadian politics until Harper’s election in 2006. However, their role was more influence-peddling than anything else. They also don’t have close ties to Canada’s Epstein’s.
The source of the fake scandals, sudden deaths, etc. which effectively removed certain people in politics and government and replaced them with those who were part of the Starnes/Reitman cult or under their influence, were far more likely to be Canada’s Epsteins: the Starnes/Reitman cult, given the outcomes, relationships, and who benefited.
Trudeau’s election is a good example of that. While Harper was connected to the US Epsteins through Bronfman and others, the Starnes/Reitman cult, Canada’s Epsteins favored Trudeau. Were they aware of Trudeau’s NDA, enforced on a minor who was paid millions to remain silent about a sexual relationship she had with him when he was a teacher? Most likely. They appear to recruit and associate with a LOT of people from pedophile circles. In my opinion, too many for it to just be a coincidence. Trudeau had a landslide victory in the 2019 election, despite this real scandal which wasn’t covered by Mainstream Media (MSM) other than to attempt to discredit it.
While Snopes claims this is all unproven, the following article includes an interview with the girls’ father, who isn’t covered by the agreement, and the journalist was able to review the actual NDA which was sent to the girl’s father by mistake.
Trudeau’s West Grey accuser was much younger than first thought
Meanwhile, Doug Ford, who had no political presence and very little political experience, but was under the Starnes/Reitman cult influence, was their preferred choice to lead Ontario. His brother, Rob Ford, ex-Mayor of Toronto wasn’t one to submit to cults. He died suddenly of cancer. Doug Ford had control of his estate and was accused of breach of trust by Rob Ford’s wife and children. Did the Starnes/Reitman cult help him? Is that how he got under their influence? If so, it wouldn’t be the first time, or the last time inheritance was used to create a hostile environment within a family.
Doug Ford, brother named in $16M lawsuit by widow over Rob Ford’s estate
Doug Ford is facing more family legal issues
In order to replace Brown with Ford, a sex scandal was fabricated to oust Patrick Brown from the leadership of the Ontario Conservative Party. The woman, who initially, claimed she had been a minor when they were involved, later admitted she was 18 and he was 21 at the time. Of course, by the time the admission came out, Brown had been ousted and replaced by Ford. The damage was done. MSM, especially CTV regularly jumps on the Starnes/Reitman cult propaganda and smear bandwagon and got sued for it this time. Brown won his Defamation case against them.
John Kennett Starnes, only real area of expertise, as far as I can tell, was Dirty Tricks including criminal acts. He considered himself above the law.
This is also what the second and third generations of Canada’s Epsteins focus on when it comes to their tactics.
The original group of psychopaths led by Starnes has mostly retired into the woodwork but is still active behind the scenes to a much lesser extent.
Now that Starnes and the first generation Reitman, Cyril, is deceased, we have Joel Reitman, who I believe is a Sociopath, moving in to replace the Puppet Master but without the skills of a real Puppet Master. He’s exploiting what was set up for him to exploit, as is his son, Sociopath-in-training, Sam Reitman. That’s probably all they need to do to maintain this system of corruption, blackmail and abuse of power that’s been created. They also consider themselves above the law and go to extreme lengths to cover up their crimes, corruption and abuses of power.
This new framework for undermining democracy, such as it was, was developed by Canada’s Epstein’s at the turn of this new century in Canada, and has been firmly in place since about 2010.
Variations of it, like the US Epstein cult, have existed in other countries for much longer but the agenda is the same everywhere.
The purpose of the following SNA diagram (when it’s completed) will be to identify this Canadian network of corruption and abuse of power (as much as I’m able to based on my own personal, direct knowledge).
Everything within the black circle will be representative of Canada’s Epsteins: the Starnes/Reitman cult and will be identified independent of any connections with me or CPC(ML) since we aren’t part of their network. I’m it’s target and I believe CPC(ML) was exploited to both isolate and gain access to me through a tiny handful of relatives connected to them.
Much of this network was used to target me and it will continue to be used to target others.
What you don’t know can hurt you.
What Is the VENN Diagram Telling Us?
The VENN diagram overlaying the SNA shows the relationships. My explanations of the VENN portion are below the diagram.
Interesting things to note about the VENN/SNA diagram:
1. I’m completely outside of the Starnes/Reitman cult circles.
2. The only connections between me and them are indirect connections involving specific people in my family who I haven’t associated with for years other than when necessary. I broke ties in my teens and 20s with these people because of their abusive, toxic behavior towards me.
3. The closest tie to me is my mother, (deceased in 2018), who I didn’t break ties with, and where there are 7 degrees of separation between me and the Starnes Reitman cult through her connection to my uncle and CPC(ML). This is FURTHER than the 6 degrees of separation which is considered the norm. This is what makes their 50+ years, multi-generational obsession with me and my children; constant incursions into my life; apparently intentional associations with family members who are hostile to me; an extremely bizarre ANOMALY which is highly unlikely to be a “coincidence”.
4. Starnes/Reitman connections have encroached into my circles using connected or compromised employers, online Trolls, (listed) as well as business and community groups, police agencies, etc., etc. which have yet to be added.
5. The one person outside of my family, who is part of the bridge, was a brief contact, a CPC(ML) member who actually helped me at an important time when I really needed it. I still believe she’s a nice person and just being manipulated. I could be wrong. It wouldn’t be the first time. I just never sensed any malicious intent from her and she was open about who she was and her familial connections. I only ever sensed goodwill and friendship from her.
That changed when she and others became Starnes targets and he intentionally excluded me from the group he targeted to give the false impression that I had done something to hurt them. I hadn’t. He had. I had been very grateful for the help provided.
He hated the fact that I was always able to find help when I needed it, punished those who acted on my behalf while giving the false impression that I had something to do with it with or without fabricated “evidence”.
This was a standard practice for Starnes. It was a method he employed repeatedly because it was the only way he could generate any hostility towards me. I get along with people for the most part and have better things to do than waste my time messing with them and their lives. Unlike the Starnes/Reitman cult which apparently doesn’t have anything better to do.
6. The other interesting ANOMALY that was hidden until I did this chart: Manny Gitterman is the ONLY person in the entire diagram that is connected directly to both Joel and Jill Reitman and the CPC(ML) leadership. He had his own direct relationship with CPC(ML) as a member as well as later establishing a bridge directly into the CPC(ML) leadership through my cousin, opportunist and sellout Indira Nunner, who was/is(?) a member of the Central Committee.
7. Manny and Indira got together in the 1980s AFTER I cut off ties with her, and our relationship had become quite hostile and toxic. Is that why he connected with her?
8. Manny comes from a very wealthy Toronto family (yet another Trust Fund baby) like the Reitman’s.
Who’s playing who? What is the scam here?
Perhaps this is just a self-serving unholy alliance? In which case, CPC(ML) considers me a political enemy. IF this is true (and I don’t know whether it is or not). Why would they? I know they fell for Starnes scam when I was helped but that incident would hardly qualify me as a political enemy and given what they knew of my situation, they shouldn’t have fallen for it in the first place. They should have seen it for what it was. An obvious scam. The reality is that I’ve never done anything that would justify declaring me a political enemy.
Or, was/is Manny Gitterman, a Starnes/Reitman cult infiltrator from the start (1970s) and brought in to leadership circles by my sellout and opportunist cousin, Indira Nunner (knowingly or unknowingly), in order to influence it. Was it his job to frame me somehow, or influence the leadership into believing, that I was a political enemy in order to eliminate any potential allies on my side?
Is this why Joel Reitman and Manny Gitterman were engaging in so many extreme deceptions and gaslighting to hide their close working relationship from 2014 to date?
From approximately 2004 and on, Gitterman was also working closely with Jill Reitman at CAMH (Centre for Addiction and Mental Health) for several years. Jill Reitman was a CAMH Psychologist at the time and one who apparently thinks Gaslighting is “fun and funny”.
Or, perhaps something else is going on that I’m simply not privy to.
I don’t know the answers to the questions I’ve asked throughout this article.
I only know the outcomes, relationships and who benefits from all of this, and that’s where my conclusions come from.
The prime ministers the Israelis control via Epstein's blackmail ring include their own:
Two prime ministers made multiple trips on the Lolita Express; Anthony Charles Lynton Blair and Benjamin Netanyahu. The latter has spent most of the time following Epstein's death hovering betwixt jail and office! Given the way that Blair was catapulted into power from obscurity when his (wholly incorruptible) predecessor John Smith QC MP died (four days after Phillip Gould had said "If John dies now, Tony will become leader, if he dies next year it will be Gordon ") Blair's political successful political career probably followed his compromise rather than the other way round.
Once they knew they had Blair, they groomed and supported his rise to power by every means possible. His early efforts at local politics were notably less successful than those of his wife, Cherie Booth! Then, suddenly everything changed.
The only way his Chancellor and rival, Gordon Brown could have been controlled would be by feeding him misleading ideas and information: he is only capable of being corrupted intellectually as sex, money and even prestige don't really register with him. (He would have been a much more natural successor to John Smith than Blair!)
Power, money and prestige mean so much to Blair, however, that if he had simply been TOLD that he could have all of those, if only he would let his puppet-masters have some sexual blackmail material on him, so they could "trust" him, then he might have happily and knowingly compromised himself with whatever under-age girls or boys were on offer.
John Major would have been a pretty hopeless target for sexual blackmail: when he was suspected of having an affair with a decidedly adult Downing Street caterer, it turned out just to be a cover for him having an affair with a fellow cabinet minister. At which point, largely led by "Spitting Image" the press all assumed he was sleeping with Virginia Bottomly, the only member of the Tory cabinet the press could imagine ANYONE wanting to sleep with. The awful truth turned out to be Edwina Currie...
Margaret Thatcher would have been hard to compromise, not because she was particularly au fait with that sort of skullduggery but her husband, Dennis, had been in business long enough to know where all the pitfalls were and he steered her as well clear of them as he could. Her weakness was a tendency to forgive male subordinates who compromised themselves, rather than kicking them out in the public interest.
Jim Callaghan was too moral to do anything wicked and too clever to do anything stupid, which is a rare combination in any politician. Furthermore, he worked his way up through the ranks so patiently that he probably never looked like a rising star WORTH compromising before he knew all the ropes and was pretty invulnerable. An awful lot of powerful people hated him and they brought down his government, but they never got close to compromising him as a person. (Bit like Liz Truss, really!)
Harold Wilson took policy advice from some shady customers (because they were SUCCESSFUL shady customers) but, rather like Richard Nixon, he barely registers on the Blair/Trudeau personal corruption scale.
Nobody on God's Earth could have corrupted Edward Heath into being the way he was. All the allegations of sexual abuse against him were patently false: not only did they describe luxury double beds on his RACING yacht; even abusive sexual relationships are still human relationships and Edward Heath simply did not do human relationships.
Jeremy Thorpe managed to get himself into worse trouble than any Epstein type racket could have gotten him into and the establishment had to pull out all the stops to keep him out of jail. His colleague Cyril Smith achieved even worse without the publicity, even though Cabinet Minister Barbara Castle compiled a dossier on his sexual abuses and presented it to a newspaper editor. They corrupted themselves and the establishment rescued them. The establishment probably had to protect Thorpe in order to protect Cyril Smith, who seems to have been more influential even though he was never Party Leader.
Thorpe's current successor as Lib-Dem leader, Ed Davey, took a huge (£4M) consultancy fee from a Chinese energy firm (ALL Chinese firms are controlled by the CCP) after he had, as Energy Minister in the Coalition Government, allowed a Chinese energy company to be part of the deal to build a replacement nuclear power station at Hinkley Point. No sex, no blackmail: straightforward and utterly unambiguous bribery there.
One would have to have a heart of stone not to see why John Profumo got into bed with Christine Keeler and one might even think she was worth the consequences